Skip to main content

Roberts v. Roberts

Citations

  • 384 S.E.2d 719
  • 299 S.C. 315
  • 1989 S.C. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence must be offered before opposing party may object to its introduction or trial judge may rule on its admissibility
  • the spouse claiming an equitable interest in property upon dissolution of the marriage has the burden of proving the property is part of the marital estate
  • the party having peculiar knowledge of the facts or control of evidence on an issue has the burden of presenting evidence on it
  • the burden of evidence is imposed on the party best able to sustain it, that is, the party having peculiar knowledge of the facts or control of the evidence relating to an issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Finney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.