Skip to main content

State v. Martin

Citations

  • 385 N.W.2d 549
  • 1986 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that error is preserved where issue raised on appeal is considered and ruled on by the district court
  • where court demonstrated it was aware of defendant’s purpose in objecting to State’s motion in li-mine, defendant could later rely on Iowa R.Evid. 608 as a ground for objection, rather than Iowa R.Evid. 404, where defendant earlier had relied only on Iowa R.Evid. 404

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.