State v. Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the requisite number of jurors must agree that “the defendant actually committed the acts that constitute the crime charged”
• “This is not a case like King or White, in which the state merely offered alternative evidence of a single factual occurrence. Instead, it is like Boots, in that the jury was allowed to base its verdict on alternative factual occurrences, each of which itself would be a separate crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ashkins
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-09-11· cited 75×
• Antoine v. Taylor
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-11-24· cited 59×
• State v. Rodriguez-Castillo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-01-24· cited 16×
• State v. Greeley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-14· cited 13×
• State v. Teagues
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-21· cited 10×
• State v. Sullivan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 4×
• State v. Owens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-03-17· cited 3×
• Wilson v. Premo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-24· cited 3×