State v. Herzog

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a West German conviction by a two-person jury was unconstitutional on its face and could not be considered as criminal history, thereby implying the foreign conviction, but for its unconstitutionality, would have counted as criminal history
• holding a West German conviction by a two-person jury was unconstitutional on its face and could not be considered as criminal history, thereby implying the foreign conviction, but for its unconstitutionality, would have counted as criminal history
• conviction by a two-person jury was facially invalid and trial court correctly refused to consider it in sentencing
• conviction by a two-person jury was facially invalid and trial court correctly refused to consider it in sentencing
• defendant’s West Germany convictions by a two-person jury violated Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution
• defendant's West Germany convictions by a two-person jury violated Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).