Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/17/2001
State v. Holmes
Citations
- 108 Wash. App. 511
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring officers to inquire further when it was unclear that a person giving consent to search had authority to do so
- because the person who claimed to be a coinhabitant did not have a key, police officers should have doubted her authority to consent, despite her explicit assurance that she lived there
- Ferrier warnings required where police went to defendant’s apartment without a warrant, intending to search for contraband
- Ferrier warnings required where police went to defendant's apartment without a warrant, intending to search for contraband
- “whether officers reasonably believe in third person’s authority to consent [to search] is judged against an objective standard”
- because the person who claimed to be a coinhabitant did not have a key, police officers should have doubted her authority to consent, despite her explicit assur- anee that she lived there
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MorseWashington Supreme Court· 2005-12-01· cited 94×
- State v. DancerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-30· cited 13×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-10-04· cited 9×
- State v. RisonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-22· cited 6×
- State v. MonfortWashington Supreme Court· 2013-11-14· cited 3×
- State v. KhounvichaiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-25· cited 3×
- State Of Washington, V Cheryl E. DancerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-04-30
- State Of Washington, V. Bradley R. GibersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-04-04
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court· 1999-01-28· cited 310×
- State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court· 1998-08-27· cited 227×
- United States v. Miguel RodriguezSeventh Circuit· 1989-11-01· cited 168×
- State v. ChrismanWashington Supreme Court· 1984-01-26· cited 165×
- United States v. YarbroughNinth Circuit· 1988-07-06· cited 162×
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 2000-10-19· cited 92×
- State v. MatheWashington Supreme Court· 1984-09-27· cited 80×
- State v. Bustamante-DavilaWashington Supreme Court· 1999-09-09· cited 77×
- State v. HawkinsIdaho Court of Appeals· 1998-04-13· cited 75×
- City of Seattle v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 1995-12-21· cited 57×
- Robinson v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-10-02· cited 53×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-01-19· cited 34×
- State v. McCaugheyIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-09-29· cited 33×
- United States v. Henry Howard BaswellEighth Circuit· 1986-06-10· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.