· 12/21/1995
City of Seattle v. Williams
Citations
- 908 P.2d 359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an appellate court should decline to reach constitutional issues when they are not necessary to resolve the case
- doubting significance of legislative rejection of proposed provision to fully preempt field of regulating driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor
- courts \are duty-bound to give meaning to every word that the Legislature chose to include in a statute and to avoid rendering any language superfluous\
- courts “are duty-bound to give meaning to every word that the Legislature chose to include in a statute and to avoid rendering any language superfluous”
- in looking to discern what Legislature intended, courts look to plain meaning of the words used in the statute
- in looking to discern what Legislature intended, courts look to plain meaning of the words used in the statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alexander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.