Skip to main content
· 12/21/1995

City of Seattle v. Williams

Citations

  • 908 P.2d 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an appellate court should decline to reach constitutional issues when they are not necessary to resolve the case
  • doubting significance of legislative rejection of proposed provision to fully preempt field of regulating driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor
  • courts \are duty-bound to give meaning to every word that the Legislature chose to include in a statute and to avoid rendering any language superfluous\
  • courts “are duty-bound to give meaning to every word that the Legislature chose to include in a statute and to avoid rendering any language superfluous”
  • in looking to discern what Legislature intended, courts look to plain meaning of the words used in the statute
  • in looking to discern what Legislature intended, courts look to plain meaning of the words used in the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.