United States v. Miguel Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding so that the district court may make further findings on the scope of consent to search
• “Rodriguez is entitled by statute to de novo 5 review of the subject. Under Raddatz [447 U.S. 667 (1980
• “Rodriguez is entitled by statute to de novo 5 review of the subject. Under Raddatz [447 U.S. 667 (1980
• “Rodriguez is entitled by statute to de novo 5 review of the subject. Under Raddatz [447 U.S. 667 (1980
• “Rodriguez is entitled by statute to de novo 5 review of the subject. Under Raddatz [447 U.S. 667 (1980
• “Rodriguez is entitled by statute to de novo 6 review of the subject. Under Raddatz [447 U.S. 667 (1980

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).