Supreme Court of Iowa· 7/24/1969
State v. Holliday
Citations
- 169 N.W.2d 768
- 1969 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing a federal case involving wire interceptions by a federal communications agent and repeating what the agent overheard in that case, which included the term
- describing a federal case involving wire interceptions by a federal communications agent and repeating what the agent overheard in that case, which included the term
- evidence of telephone numbers dialed from alleged perpetrator’s phone obtained by telephone company’s use of pen register held admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garfield, Larson, Moore, Stuart, Legrand, Becker, Rawlings, Mason
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BakkerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-01-18· cited 65×
- Parrish v. DenatoSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-02-22· cited 39×
- Hansen v. OwensUtah Supreme Court· 1980-10-08· cited 39×
- State v. CoySupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-12-17· cited 32×
- State v. District Court of Iowa, in & for Linn CountySupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-05-22· cited 29×
- Furey v. Crawford CountySupreme Court of Iowa· 1973-05-23· cited 26×
- State v. CullisonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-02-20· cited 25×
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-11-24· cited 23×
- Collier v. DenatoSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-11-17· cited 16×
- Steinbeck v. Iowa District Court Ex Rel. Linn CountySupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-12-18· cited 15×
- McKeever v. GerardSupreme Court of Iowa· 1985-05-22· cited 13×
- State v. PattersonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1976-03-11· cited 12×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-02-20· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. StehleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-04-22· cited 4×
- State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1994-12-14· cited 3×
- State v. KnudsenCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1993-03-30· cited 2×
- P.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-25· cited 1×
- State v. BarkerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-01-18· cited 1×
- State of Iowa v. Brandon Clark ManningCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2014-10-15
- David James Hanson, Magistrate.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2025-04-18
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 2,107×
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 1,253×
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 1,237×
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 1,212×
- Irvine v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1954-03-15· cited 357×
- Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-01-13· cited 309×
- Lee v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 192×
- Fuller v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1968-12-09· cited 161×
- People v. TarantinoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-11-28· cited 125×
- United States v. John A. McGuire Edmond G. Blumner and Herbert PerrySecond Circuit· 1967-07-20· cited 60×
- United States v. Rocco Dote and Theodore P. Veesart, United States of America v. Nick Guglielmo and Joseph B. Delmonico, A/K/A Joey D.Seventh Circuit· 1966-12-20· cited 51×
- Hohl v. Board of Education of Poweshiek CountySupreme Court of Iowa· 1959-02-10· cited 51×
- State v. EadsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1969-04-08· cited 46×
- Sackler v. SacklerNew York Court of Appeals· 1964-12-03· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.