Commonwealth v. Stehley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expectation of privacy in regard to a pen register can be adequately protected by the Fourth Amendment and \we find no significant expectation of privacy to exist with respect to the destination of one's phone calls\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Melilli
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-13· cited 121×
• Commonwealth v. Beauford
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-29· cited 83×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Giordano
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 898×
• Commonwealth v. Agie
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-17· cited 185×
• United States v. Focarile
  D. Maryland· 1972-02-22· cited 103×
• Commonwealth v. Reid
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 95×
• State v. Holliday
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1969-07-24· cited 25×
• Bixler v. Hille
  Washington Supreme Court· 1972-05-25· cited 18×
• People v. Stewart
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 1973-03-28· cited 5×
• In re Korman
  N.D. Illinois· 1972-08-17· cited 3×
• London v. Smith-Cairns Motor Sales Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1965-03-30· cited 2×