State v. Bakker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “typographical error” in date of warrant stating it was issued three days after the search occurred did not invalidate warrant
• “[I]n establishing a chain of custody adequate to justify the admission of physical evidence, the State only need show circumstances making it reasonably probable that tampering, substitution or alteration of evidence did not occur.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).