Utah Supreme Court· 6/21/1989
State v. Holland
Citations
- 777 P.2d 1019
- 111 Utah Adv. Rep. 8
- 1989 Utah LEXIS 60
- 1989 WL 73121
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in capital cases, we engage \in a 'comprehensive review' of the record for manifest or plain error\ (citing State v. Eldredge, 773 P.2d 29, 34-35 (Utah 1989))
- holding that Utah's death penalty statute narrowed the numbers of those who may be sentenced to death in accordance with the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution
- stating that the “first step” in a capital sentencing evaluation is “to determine whether the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt”
- stating that the “first step” in a capital sentencing evaluation is “to determine whether the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt”
- construing Utah Code Ann. § 77-35-26(10) (Supp. 1989)
- construing Utah Code Ann. § 77-35-26(10) (Supp. 1989)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman, Hall, Howe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1990-04-24· cited 2,590×
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court· 2012-07-27· cited 176×
- Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court· 2011-11-22· cited 116×
- State v. YoungUtah Supreme Court· 1993-03-17· cited 103×
- Monson v. CarverUtah Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 97×
- State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court· 2001-02-23· cited 89×
- State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court· 1995-01-18· cited 87×
- State v. ArguellesUtah Supreme Court· 2003-01-14· cited 68×
- State v. PereaUtah Supreme Court· 2013-11-15· cited 64×
- State v. ParsonsUtah Supreme Court· 1989-10-13· cited 63×
- State v. ArchuletaUtah Supreme Court· 1993-03-25· cited 62×
- State v. HonieUtah Supreme Court· 2002-01-11· cited 54×
- State v. KellUtah Supreme Court· 2002-11-01· cited 52×
- State v. WoodUtah Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 45×
- State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court· 1992-03-11· cited 41×
- State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court· 1997-09-30· cited 37×
- State v. HollandUtah Supreme Court· 1996-06-21· cited 35×
- Gardner v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court· 1994-11-10· cited 33×
- Vigos v. Mountainland Builders, Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 2000-01-07· cited 31×
- Tillman v. CookUtah Supreme Court· 1993-03-31· cited 27×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 1,935×
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 1,790×
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 1,036×
- Satterwhite v. TexasSupreme Court· 1988-05-31· cited 926×
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 792×
- Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court· 1912-05-13· cited 498×
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court· 1988-02-03· cited 250×
- State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court· 1988-01-11· cited 244×
- Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1895-11-18· cited 240×
- State v. TillmanUtah Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 213×
- State v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court· 1989-02-01· cited 147×
- State v. PierreUtah Supreme Court· 1977-11-25· cited 121×
- Ex Parte ArthurSupreme Court of Alabama· 1985-04-05· cited 103×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.