Utah Supreme Court· 6/21/1996

State v. Holland

Citations

921 P.2d 430
293 Utah Adv. Rep. 27
1996 Utah LEXIS 46
1996 WL 342286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating “the ultimate question of whether the trial court strictly complied with constitutional and procedural requirements for entry of a guilty plea is a question of law that is reviewed for correctness”
“[T]he ultimate question of whether the trial court strictly complied with constitutional and procedural requirements for entry of a guilty plea is a question of law that is reviewed for correctness.”
“[T]he ultimate question of whether the trial court strictly complied with constitutional and procedural requirements ... is a question of law that is reviewed for correctness.”
reciting only the facts pertinent to the issues on appeal
mental conditions, including depression, rendered defendant incompetent to plead guilty
reciting only the facts pertinent to the issues on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russon, Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.