Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/20/1991
State v. Hobson
Citations
- 810 P.2d 70
- 61 Wash. App. 330
- 1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that \the prosecution must use all available means to compel the witness's presence at trial\
- stating that “the prosecution must use all available means to compel the witness’s presence at trial”
- noting that \Washington case law is silent on the issue of whether the State must obtain a material witness warrant to hold a witness in custody whenever the State knows such action may be necessary to ensure the witness's presence at trial.\
- “Washington courts have held, as a general rule, that the prosecution must use all available means to compel the witness’s presence at trial.”
- confrontation clause requires that former testimony must be reliable and its admission at trial must be necessary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AshcraftCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-10-11· cited 105×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 89×
- State v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-05-02· cited 41×
- State v. HacheneyWashington Supreme Court· 2007-05-31· cited 34×
- State v. S.S.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-11-30· cited 28×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-10· cited 19×
- State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-12-15· cited 9×
- State v. DeSantiagoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-03· cited 8×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-09-28· cited 2×
- State v. SSCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-11-30
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 1,846×
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 576×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1984-12-05· cited 155×
- United States v. PerezNinth Circuit· 1981-06-29· cited 105×
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-01-17· cited 36×
- State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-18· cited 32×
- State v. HewettWashington Supreme Court· 1976-02-11· cited 30×
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-12-03· cited 20×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-26· cited 17×
- State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-20· cited 13×
- United States v. Hector Acevedo-RamosFirst Circuit· 1988-03-11· cited 12×
- State v. GoddardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-08-13· cited 12×
- State v. AaronCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-11-23· cited 11×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-22· cited 10×
- State v. FirvenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-02-21· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.