Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/13/1984
State v. Goddard
Citations
- 685 P.2d 674
- 38 Wash. App. 509
- 1984 Wash. App. LEXIS 3411
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- State did not issue subpoena or attempt to induce witness to remain in the state
- witness not unavailable when State permitted witness to return to California and made no effort to obtain his presence at trial
- witness not unavailable when State permitted witness to return to California and made no effort to obtain his presence at trial
- “[T]he prosecution is required to avail itself of whatever procedures exist to bring a witness to trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scholfield, Swanson, Ringold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 89×
- United States v. CrockettUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1986-03-24· cited 20×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-26· cited 17×
- State v. HobsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-05-20· cited 16×
- State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-20· cited 13×
- State v. AaronCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-11-23· cited 11×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-22· cited 10×
- State v. DeSantiagoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-03· cited 8×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-09-28· cited 2×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.