State v. Firven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• complaining witnesses, Navy seamen scheduled to ship out prior to trial, found unavailable
• RAP 9.6 requires \[t]he party seeking review of a lower court's ruling [to] designat[e] the necessary clerk's papers and exhibits.\
• RAP 9.6 requires “[t]he party seeking review of a lower court’s ruling [to] designate] the necessary clerk’s papers and exhibits.”
• witnesses — navy seamen — were unavailable and their depositions properly admitted when prosecutor subpoenaed witnesses prior to their departure and witnesses were physically unavailable to testify at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Detention of Halgren
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-04-13· cited 77×
• In re the Detention of Halgren
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-04-13· cited 72×
• State v. Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-12-03· cited 20×
• State v. Hobson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-05-20· cited 16×
• State v. Aaron
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-11-23· cited 11×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hewett
  Washington Supreme Court· 1976-02-11· cited 30×
• Heilman v. Wentworth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-11-28· cited 20×
• State v. Roebuck
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-12-13· cited 14×

Other cases named State v. Firven

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• State v. Firven
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-04-24