State v. Hiner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]uty to report is triggered only after a sex offender has both left the former residence and acquired a new one.”
• construing former ORS 181.599(l)(d) (2011) to that effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Olson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-03-20· cited 4×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-11-06· cited 3×
• State v. Streeter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-04-15· cited 2×
• State v. McColligan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-28
• State v. Williams
  Douglas County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-02

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bivins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-21· cited 172×
• State v. Mills
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-10-17· cited 48×
• Smith v. Department of Corrections
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-09· cited 16×
• State v. Lopez-Medina
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-28· cited 14×
• State v. MacNab
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-24· cited 14×
• State v. Vaughn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-07-05· cited 13×
• State v. Piazza
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-01· cited 9×
• State v. Cox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-16· cited 5×
• People v. Corbin
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2003-11-20· cited 1×