State v. Piazza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the stacking of inferences that the state urges is simply too speculative”
• “[T]he stacking of inferences that the state urges is simply too speculative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bivins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-21· cited 172×
• State v. Paragon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-15· cited 29×
• State v. Warner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-29· cited 28×
• State v. MacNab
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-24· cited 14×
• State v. Hennagir
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-09· cited 8×
• State v. Hiner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-04· cited 5×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-23· cited 3×
• Scott v. Kesselring
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-16· cited 1×
• State v. Lockhart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-13