State v. Olson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an infer- ence is permissible where there is a logical probability that an ultimate fact will follow a stated narrative or historical fact
• “[I]f established facts can support multiple reasonable inferences, it is for the factfinder to decide which inference to draw.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.)
• “[I]f established facts can support multiple reasonable inferences, it is for the factfinder to decide which inference to draw.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. J. D. B.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-07· cited 5×
• State v. C. A. M.-D.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-06-03· cited 3×
• State v. Campbell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-08· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bivins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-21· cited 172×
• State v. Lupoli
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-06-04· cited 104×
• State v. Rainey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 73×
• State v. Long
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-21· cited 16×
• State v. Hiner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-04· cited 5×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-18· cited 2×