State v. MacNab

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the use of circumstantial evidence from which venue may be inferred
• “[W]e have described an impermissible inference as one that ‘requires too great an inferential leap,’ State v. Lopez–Medina, 143 Or App 195, 201, 923 P2d 1240 (1996

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Turner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-09· cited 12×
• State v. Rogers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-18· cited 11×
• Hannemann v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-11· cited 10×
• State v. Hennagir
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-09· cited 8×
• State v. Massei
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-14· cited 6×
• State v. Pugh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-21· cited 5×
• State v. Hiner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-04· cited 5×
• State v. Lupercio-Quezada
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-24· cited 4×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-08· cited 4×
• Macnab v. State
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-15· cited 3×
• Scott v. Kesselring
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-16· cited 1×
• State v. Campbell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-08· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bivins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-21· cited 172×
• State v. Cervantes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 131×
• Tose v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N. A.
  Supreme Court· 1981-10-13· cited 29×
• State v. Lopez-Medina
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-28· cited 14×
• State v. Vaughn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-07-05· cited 13×
• State v. Piazza
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-01· cited 9×
• State v. Rose
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-23· cited 8×
• State v. Means
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-06· cited 6×