Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/24/1997
State v. Hinds
Citations
- 936 P.2d 1135
- 85 Wash. App. 474
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- an oral decision may supplement written findings to the extent the oral decision does not conflict with the written findings
- an oral decision may supplement written findings to the extent the oral decision does not conflict with the written findings
- appellate court may resort to the trial court' s oral decision to interpret findings as long as no inconsistency with written findings.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CroninWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 186×
- In Re DomingoWashington Supreme Court· 2006-01-01· cited 43×
- In re the Personal Restraint of DomingoWashington Supreme Court· 2005-09-15· cited 41×
- State Dept. of Rev. v. Security Pac. BankCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-01-11· cited 21×
- Department of Revenue v. Security Pacific Bank of Washington National Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-01-11· cited 21×
- Sargent v. Seattle Police DeparmentCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-09-19· cited 13×
- State Of Washington, V Zachary Alan FletcherCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-12-14· cited 4×
- State v. TorresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-06· cited 2×
- SHIRLEY COTO v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-06-07
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1985-04-11· cited 636×
- Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court· 1992-02-20· cited 228×
- State v. AlvarezWashington Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 174×
- Baughn v. Honda Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1986-11-06· cited 109×
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court· 1984-05-31· cited 109×
- Young v. Caravan CorporationWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-08· cited 90×
- In re the Personal Restraint of Langhout-NixWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-08· cited 68×
- State v. ChaddertonWashington Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 65×
- State v. AlexanderWashington Supreme Court· 1995-01-26· cited 64×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of HewsWashington Supreme Court· 1987-08-06· cited 62×
- State v. FerreiraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-04-22· cited 47×
- Estate of Kelly v. FalinWashington Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 45×
- State v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-10-13· cited 32×
- State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-13· cited 12×
- State v. GieddCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-05-21· cited 7×
- State v. AmurriCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-04· cited 6×
- Rinks v. BearssCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-08-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.