Skip to main content

State v. Hinds

Citations

  • 936 P.2d 1135
  • 85 Wash. App. 474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • an oral decision may supplement written findings to the extent the oral decision does not conflict with the written findings
  • an oral decision may supplement written findings to the extent the oral decision does not conflict with the written findings
  • appellate court may resort to the trial court' s oral decision to interpret findings as long as no inconsistency with written findings.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.