Washington Supreme Court· 5/31/1984

State v. Davis

Citations

682 P.2d 883
101 Wash. 2d 654
1984 Wash. LEXIS 1674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the State is not required to prove that the accomplice knew the principal was armed
reaffirming McKim’s distinction between accomplice liability for substantive crime and sentencing enhancements
affirming conviction for first degree robbery despite defendant’s asserted lack of knowledge that the principal was armed with a deadly weapon, because such knowledge was not needed to prove accomplice liability
reaffirming McKim's distinction between accomplice liability for substantive crime and sentencing enhancements
accomplice liability, RCW 9A.08.020, attaches regardless of whether the alleged accomplice knew the coparticipant was armed
law imposes “strict liability on all those involved in robbery which, by its very nature, generally requires use of weapons”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosellini, Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.