Utah Supreme Court· 11/1/1983

State v. Hill

Citations

674 P.2d 96
1983 Utah LEXIS 1207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that theft conviction merged with aggravated robbery but declining to remand for resentencing on aggravated robbery
explaining that where one variation of the greater offense would not require proof of all of the elements of a lesser offense, it is proper to consider whether the crimes have a greater-lesser relationship under the facts at issue
theoretical comparison insufficient for theft and multiple variation crime of aggravated robbery
“When a defendant has been improperly convicted of both a greater and a lesser offense, it is appropriate to regard the conviction on the lesser offense as mere surplus-age, which does not invalidate the conviction and sentence on the greater offense.”
theft may be a lesser included offense of aggravated robbery
theft is a lesser included offense of aggravated robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oaks, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Baldwin, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.