United States v. Mike Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider defendant’s claim that verdict was ambiguous because objection was not made at trial
• affirming trial court's entry of judgment of conviction on the greater charge when jury returned \guilty\ verdicts on both the greater charge (distribution of heroin) and its lesser-included offense (possession of heroin) even though it was instructed not to do so
• cannot convict of both distribution of heroin and lesser included offense of simple possession arising out of same facts
• A defendant may not be charged and convicted of both a major offense and a lesser included offense arising out of the same facts ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).