Skip to main content

State v. Higgins

Citations

  • 149 N.H. 290
  • 821 A.2d 964
  • 2003 N.H. LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address merger argument as either cursory in nature or wholly lacking in merit
  • “Each decision to consent is a new act, a choice made on the circumstances prevailing in the present, not governed by the past.” (quotation simplified)
  • Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 476 (2000), requires that “any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum, other than the fact of a prior conviction, must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brock, Broderick, Dalianis, Nadeau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.