Gallegos v. Citizens Insurance Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding erroneous admission of evidence was harmless to the issue of liability for breach of contract, but affected party’s substantial rights on the issue of punitive damages
• findings of comparative negligence are inapplicable for breach of contract and the vicarious liability of partners
• findings of comparative negligence are inapplicable for breach of contract and the vicarious liability of partners
• even before the rule change, supreme court would not automatically deny review to issues raised for the first time in the brief-in-chief
• an assertion of prejudice is not a showing of prejudice, and in the absence of prejudice there is no reversible error
• when punitive damages “are awarded against two or more defendants they must be separately determined as to each”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).