State v. Henry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Substantial evidence, which may be either circumstantial or direct, is evidence that a reasonable jury can accept as sufficient to infer guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
• finding the benefit may be the defendant’s own sexual gratification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ellison
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-09· cited 257×
• Fragoso v. Fell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-05-10· cited 114×
• State of Arizona v. Robert Francisco Borquez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-07-25· cited 53×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-02-17· cited 24×
• State v. Kinney
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-10-28· cited 22×
• State v. Guadagni
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-29· cited 16×
• State of Arizona v. Francisco Antonio Lopez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-06-29· cited 15×
• State v. Alvarez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-01-24· cited 14×
• State v. Rivera
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-01-27· cited 8×
• State v. Latham
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-10-29· cited 4×
• State v. Hollenback
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-12-29· cited 4×
• State of Arizona v. Michael Lorenzo Rivera
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-01-27
• State of Arizona v. Nathan Douglas Kinney
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-10-28
• State of Arizona v. Donald Allen Guadagni
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-29
• State of Arizona v. Kenneth Scott MacHado
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-05-10
• State of Arizona v. Robert Michael Hollenback
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-12-29
• State of Arizona v. Charles Scott Newnom
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-08-25
• State of Arizona v. Lawrence Brown, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-02-17
• Renee Antonio Fragoso v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-05-10