Nebraska Supreme Court· 2/26/2016

State v. Henry

Citations

292 Neb. 834
875 N.W.2d 374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that “proponent of the text messages is not required to conclusively prove who authored the messages” and “possibility of an alteration or misuse by another generally goes to weight, not admissibility” (citations omitted)
stating an alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in the brief of the party asserting the error to be considered by an appellate court
stating an alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in the brief of the party asserting the error to be considered by an appellate court
stating an alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in the brief of the party asserting the error to be considered by an appellate court
alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error to be considered by appellate court
alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error to be considered by appel- late court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Henry

271 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.