United States v. Marina Zarnes, Michael W. Nietupski, Jeffrey L. Hunter, Benny L. Battles, Michael R. Dionne, Marvin G. Bland, and Thomas J. Nietupski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of drug transactions completed before conspiracy began was intricately related to conspiracy case because it showed how the relationship between the parties began and unfolded into the charged conspiracy
• holding that evidence of drug transactions completed before con- spiracy began was intricately related to conspiracy case because it showed how the relationship between the parties began and unfolded into the charged conspiracy
• affirming based on transaction frequency, standard- ized dealings, and “fronting,” among other things, and dis- cussing factors
• affirming based on transaction frequency, standard- ized dealings, and “fronting,” among other things, and dis- cussing factors
• affirming based on transaction frequency, standard- ized dealings, and “fronting,” among other things, and dis- cussing factors
• “A conspirator need not be overly involved with other conspirators, or be aware of the details of the conspiracy, to be held responsi- ble for the acts of the conspiracy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).