Idaho Supreme Court· 6/15/1988
State v. Henderson
Citations
- 756 P.2d 1057
- 114 Idaho 293
- 1988 Ida. LEXIS 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding DWI checkpoints unconstitutional under the Idaho constitution absent legislative and judicial approval
- prohibiting warrantless roadblocks to detect drunk driving under Art. 1, § 17
- Idaho Constitution prohibits use of roadblocks designed to apprehend drunk drivers absent warrant or probable cause
- Idaho Constitution prohibits use of roadblocks designed to apprehend drunk drivers absent warrant or probable cause
- roadblocks do not serve a legitimate public purpose sufficient to justify invasion of fundamental liberties under Brown v. Texas
- \the efficacy of roadblocks is questionable\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huntley, Walters, Bistline, McFadden, Tern, Bakes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals· 1999-11-15· cited 240×
- State v. DowneyTennessee Supreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 198×
- State v. BishopIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 158×
- State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-11-05· cited 152×
- State of Iowa v. Isaac Andrew Baldon IIISupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-04-19· cited 132×
- State v. CharboneauIdaho Supreme Court· 1989-04-04· cited 121×
- Susan Hallstrom Robert Hallstrom v. City of Garden City Randy W. Snapp Sgt. Thurston Vaughn Killeen, Sheriff Mike RobertsNinth Circuit· 1993-04-12· cited 111×
- People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-12-23· cited 82×
- Sims v. Collection Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 55×
- City of Bismarck v. UhdenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-03-11· cited 53×
- State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-06-28· cited 46×
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-02-23· cited 44×
- Higbie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-10-11· cited 42×
- State v. MedleyIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 36×
- State v. McCaugheyIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-09-29· cited 33×
- People v. RisterSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-12-10· cited 31×
- Brent v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-11-16· cited 30×
- State v. FeesIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-04-22· cited 29×
- State v. LeeIdaho Supreme Court· 2017-09-22· cited 29×
- Stanberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-12· cited 28×
Cites
81 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 1,282×
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 1,275×
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 1,093×
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,012×
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court· 1971-06-01· cited 1,006×
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 907×
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 837×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.