State v. Helton

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 4399

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for two counts of gross sexual imposition was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the two minor victim's testified as to appellant's acts of touching their respective erogenous zones on multiple occasions while visiting appellant at his apartment. The trial court's sentencing decision imposing a no contact order, however, was reversed and vacated since a trial court is prohibited from imposing a prison sentence and a no contact order as part of the same sentence.