State v. Young
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 912
Syllabus
Appellant's conviction for gross sexual imposition was supported by sufficient evidence, but the trial court erred by denying appellant leave to file his motion for new trial where appellant demonstrated, by clear and convincing proof, that he was unavoidably prevented from filing his motion for new trial based on an irregularity in the proceedings within the 14-day time period set forth in Crim.R. 33(B).
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-26· cited 12×
- State v. WrasmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-28· cited 10×
- State v. JozwiakOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-13· cited 8×
- State v. ChuteOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-08· cited 6×
- State v. HeltonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-28· cited 5×
- State v. PiercefieldOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-30· cited 4×
- State v. SteppOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-28· cited 3×
- State v. DennisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.