State v. Faircloth
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 878
Syllabus
Appellant's conviction for theft by deception in violation of R.C. 2913.02(A)(3) was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. However, because the trial court did not afford appellant her right to allocution at sentencing, the trial court's judgment was reversed and remanded for the limited purpose of resentencing to afford appellant her right to allocution as provided by Crim.R. 32(A)(1). WITH DISSENTING OPINION.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 3,391×
- State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 773×
- State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-25· cited 129×
- State v. RoperOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-31· cited 28×
- State v. SamamraOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-21· cited 8×
- State v. HeltonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-28· cited 5×
- State v. PowersOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-22· cited 5×
- State v. FairclothOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-30· cited 4×
- State v. ArmbrusterOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.