Skip to main content

State v. Wenthe

Citations

  • 845 N.W.2d 222
  • 2014 WL 1344193
  • 2014 Minn. App. LEXIS 35

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing between criminal-sexual-conduct offenses that include an intent element and are specific-intent crimes and criminal-sexual-conduct offenses that do not include an intent element and are general-intent crimes
  • “Third-degree criminal sexual conduct involving an impaired victim who is incapable of consenting also requires proof of specific intent because it requires proof 6 that the defendant either knows or has reason to know of the victim’s condition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crippen, Hooten, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.