Supreme Court of Minnesota· 5/25/2006
State v. Vance
Citations
- 714 N.W.2d 428
- 2006 Minn. LEXIS 359
- 2006 WL 1422917
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that threat evidence was admissible to bolster credibility of witnesses who were impeached based on cooperation with state
- noting that defendant must lay foundation “connecting the alternative perpetrator to the commission of the crime with which the defendant is charged”
- determining that alternative perpetrator evidence of a rumor regarding a suspect’s involvement in a robbery was inadmissible hearsay and therefore did not have an inherent tendency to connect the alternative perpetrator to the crime
- determining that alternative perpetrator evidence of a rumor regarding a suspect's involvement in a robbery was inadmissible hearsay and therefore did not have an inherent tendency to connect the alternative perpetrator to the crime
- \[C]ourts are hesitant to sua sponte give an instruction because an instruction may draw additional attention to potentially prejudicial issues.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Page
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-02-27· cited 62×
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-05-20· cited 60×
- State v. McArthurSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-04-12· cited 59×
- State v. NissalkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-07-13· cited 43×
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-03-26· cited 36×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-21· cited 22×
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-01-30· cited 21×
- Vance v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-07-10· cited 20×
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-09-02· cited 18×
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-10-19· cited 18×
- State v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-08-10· cited 17×
- Smart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2006-10-27· cited 8×
- Jedidiah Dean Troxel v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-02-17· cited 8×
- State of Minnesota v. Jerry Arnold WestromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-05-08· cited 6×
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Allan Carbo, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-05-08· cited 5×
- State v. ZinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-05-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.