Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/9/2010
State v. Hawkins
Citations
- 238 P.3d 1226
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Reasoning in dicta that where defendant mistakenly thought the tractor he was possessing was his own tractor, this mistake of fact did not present a factual basis for finding that he believed he was entitled to ownership of the victim’s tractor.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Korsmo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court· 1971-03-25· cited 1,211×
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 1,180×
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 1994-10-13· cited 831×
- Walker v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 387×
- State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court· 1986-04-24· cited 348×
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 2010-04-15· cited 330×
- State v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 190×
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-21· cited 176×
- Sloan v. Amherst County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 75×
- State v. RafayWashington Supreme Court· 2009-12-10· cited 71×
- State v. ZwickerWashington Supreme Court· 1986-02-10· cited 51×
- State v. HicksWashington Supreme Court· 1984-06-28· cited 46×
- State v. SmythCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-06-07· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.