Court of Appeals of Washington· 6/7/1972
State v. Smyth
Citations
- 499 P.2d 63
- 7 Wash. App. 50
- 1972 Wash. App. LEXIS 937
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- letter sent from jail to wife not privileged; defendant admitted that he knew all outgoing mail from jail was read before it was sent out
- letter sent from jail to wife not privileged; defendant admitted that he knew all outgoing mail from jail was read before it was sent out
- Since defendant knew all outgoing mail from the jail was read before being sent out, his letter was not intended to be, nor could it be, a confidential communication.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pearson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,806×
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court· 1968-03-06· cited 162×
- State v. WalcottWashington Supreme Court· 1967-12-28· cited 72×
- City of Tacoma v. MundellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-04-05· cited 25×
- State v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-04-12· cited 18×
- State v. MalbeckWashington Supreme Court· 1966-11-03· cited 16×
- State v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-02-19· cited 10×
- State v. HeyesWashington Supreme Court· 1954-04-15· cited 7×
- Peterson v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-05-27· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.