· 12/15/1982
Cole v. STATE BY & THROUGH OR. DEPT. OF REV.
Citations
- 655 P.2d 171
- 294 Or. 188
- 1982 Ore. LEXIS 1319
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- invoking Article I, section 20, requires classes identifiable by characteristics other than those created by the statutes attacked
- procedural requirement that one pay assessed taxes before suing to have them refunded not type of injury contemplated by Article I, section 10
- persons appealing income tax assessments are not a “class of persons” apart from the law at issue
- law not directed at true class passed Article I, sec- tion 20, challenge because the privilege was available upon the same terms equally to all citizens
- law not directed at true class passed Article I, sec- tion 20, challenge because the privilege was available upon the same terms equally to all citizens
- “immunity of the state [is] implicit in article IV, section 24”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Linde
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.