Skip to main content
· 12/15/1982

Cole v. STATE BY & THROUGH OR. DEPT. OF REV.

Citations

  • 655 P.2d 171
  • 294 Or. 188
  • 1982 Ore. LEXIS 1319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • invoking Article I, section 20, requires classes identifiable by characteristics other than those created by the statutes attacked
  • procedural requirement that one pay assessed taxes before suing to have them refunded not type of injury contemplated by Article I, section 10
  • persons appealing income tax assessments are not a “class of persons” apart from the law at issue
  • law not directed at true class passed Article I, sec- tion 20, challenge because the privilege was available upon the same terms equally to all citizens
  • law not directed at true class passed Article I, sec- tion 20, challenge because the privilege was available upon the same terms equally to all citizens
  • “immunity of the state [is] implicit in article IV, section 24”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linde

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.