Skip to main content

State v. Hart

Citations

  • 985 P.2d 1260
  • 329 Or. 140
  • 1999 Ore. LEXIS 500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to impose a requirement on courts to make written findings under ORS 137.106, and noting that “the word ‘findings’ does not appear in that section at all”
  • trial courts are encouraged to state findings on the record, which “always are useful and, on occasion, could even be critical” to appellate review
  • “[Sentences * * * imposed for felony convictions after November 1,1989, are subject to review under ORS 138.222,” not ORS 138.040.
  • ORS 137.106(2), which requires trial courts to \take into account\ three factors in determining whether to order restitution, does not require trial court to make explicit determinations or findings as to the statutory factors
  • ORS 137.106(2), which requires trial courts to “take into account” three factors in determining whether to order restitution, does not require trial court to make explicit determinations or findings as to the statutory factors
  • where the applicable statute did not expressly require the trial court to make findings regarding a defendant’s ability to make restitution to the victim, the court was enjoined by ORS 174.010 from reading that requirement into the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.