State v. Harris
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1579
Syllabus
Aggravated murder, murder, aggravated burglary, aggravated robbery, kidnapping, felonious assault, and having a weapon while under disability sufficiency manifest weight mistrial unadmitted evidence to jury expert testimony Evid.R. 702 Crim.R. 16 harmless error authentication Evid.R. 901 missing evidence prosecutor opening statement misstatement. Judgment affirmed. Court's exhibit No. 5 was included with the trial exhibits in error, but no harm came to the defendant by way of the momentary possession of the court's exhibit by the jury. Certain portions of testimony by forensic video analyst Ciula in this case consisted of expert testimony as set forth in Evid.R. 702. However, the harmless error analysis applies to those portions of Ciula's testimony that were expert opinion testimony, and the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt in this case means that the outcome of trial would not have been different. Crim.R. 16 was complied with because the trial court exercised its discretion and found that the expert's report was not new discovery, and even if it was, it could have been discussed when it was received, which was four days before the jury was sworn in. The state's exhibits defendant challenges were properly authenticated by the state and admissible. Furthermore, defendant fails to demonstrate how the missing crime-scene log would have been material to the case and cannot demonstrate that the failure to preserve the crime-scene log was in bad faith. There is sufficient evidence to sustain defendant's convictions and his convictions are not against the weight of the evidence based on the testimony of the four eyewitnesses combined with the defendant's own admission, the ankle monitor GPS data and the surveillance video identifying defendant and the shooter and placing at the scene of the crime. Lastly, the prosecutor's isolated misstatement did not prejudicially affect the outcome of his case because defense counsel immediately brought the misstatement to the
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 1,978×
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-20· cited 1,623×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1995-07-26· cited 1,439×
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-03· cited 1,260×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 1,198×
- State v. FranklinOhio Supreme Court· 1991-11-20· cited 798×
- State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 674×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- Ohio v. HymoreOhio Supreme Court· 1967-03-01· cited 556×
- State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 493×
- State v. TenaceOhio Supreme Court· 2006-05-31· cited 413×
- State v. DrummondOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-18· cited 390×
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 376×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-01· cited 225×
- State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court· 2003-06-11· cited 213×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.