State v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s generic confrontation objection preserved his argument for appeal because the objection emphasized the witness’s absence and the resulting inabil- ity to cross-examine that witness, thereby triggering the state’s burden to show unavailability
• declining to develop an argument on the state’s behalf regarding the witness’s unavailability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Britt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-09-18· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Peeples v. Lampert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 389×
• State v. Walker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-07-28· cited 171×
• State v. Herrera
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-05-08· cited 46×
• State v. Iseli
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-02-21· cited 20×
• State v. Supanchick
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-02-13· cited 18×
• State v. Belden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-12-02· cited 11×
• Dep't of Human Servs. v. M. E. (In re J. R.)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-24· cited 9×
• State v. Simmons
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-16· cited 6×
• R. S. R. v. Dept. of Human Services
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-20· cited 6×
• State v. Fox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-26· cited 5×