Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/22/2013
Williams v. State
Citations
- 435 Md. 474
- 79 A.3d 931
- 2013 WL 6152160
- 2013 Md. LEXIS 831
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant's letter to trial court, written in the present tense, was sufficient to trigger inquiry
- holding that the Maryland resisting arrest statute retains the offense’s common law elements
- holding that the Maryland resisting arrest statute retains the offense’s common law elements
- noting that “the onus [is] on the [circuit [c]ourt to ‘permit the defendant to explain the reasons for the request.’ ”
- “(1) [T]he defendant was arrested; (2) the arrest was lawful; and (3) the defendant refused to submit to the arrest.”
- “(1) [T]he defendant was arrested; (2) the arrest was lawful; and (3) the defendant refused to submit to the arrest.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Marcel Aparicio-SoriaFourth Circuit· 2014-01-14· cited 60×
- State v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-04-22· cited 14×
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-10-20· cited 12×
- Gambrill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-27· cited 5×
- Young v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-12-01· cited 5×
- Weathers v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-12-01· cited 4×
- State v. WeddingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2018-02-21· cited 2×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2018-01-19
- State v. BrookeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-06-26
- Akers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2025-02-19
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Parren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-04-06· cited 135×
- Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-11-15· cited 132×
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-06· cited 88×
- Denicolis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-10· cited 67×
- Snead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-01· cited 65×
- Purnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-18· cited 59×
- Barnhard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-09· cited 57×
- Nicolas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-08· cited 56×
- Leonard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-08· cited 46×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-07· cited 40×
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-03-15· cited 33×
- Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-18· cited 31×
- Board of County Commissioners v. Marcas, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-20· cited 26×
- McNeal v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-02· cited 23×
- Pinkney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-22· cited 23×
- Preston v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-04-11· cited 21×
- Knox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-03-20· cited 21×
- Brye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-09-18· cited 20×
- State v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-08-27· cited 18×
- Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-03· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.