State v. Hankerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[a]nalytically, an order reducing a charge set forth in the information or indictment to some Iesser-included offense is, despite its label, an order dismissing the charge in the information.”
• State appeal lies from order reducing charge of robbery to theft because it is functional equivalent of order dismissing higher offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Exposito v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-12-23· cited 37×
• State v. Brown
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-11-24· cited 7×
• State v. Smulowitz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-28· cited 7×
• State v. K.L.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-09· cited 4×
• State v. Odom
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-31· cited 2×
• State v. Exposito
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-25· cited 2×
• State v. MacKey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-03-13· cited 1×
• State v. Brown
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-28· cited 1×
• State v. E.N.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Creighton
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-05-02· cited 48×
• Stufflebean v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-12· cited 14×
• State Ex Rel. Sebers v. McNulty
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-06-11· cited 11×
• State v. Smulowitz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-28· cited 7×
• Hicks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-08· cited 4×