State v. Haney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the record contained evidence of intent to commit larceny when trial testimony \fully support[ed] a conclusion that the defendant gained access to the building through an unlocked window and entered the room where movie projectors and other visual aids were kept\
• refusal to give requested charge on circumstantial evidence not error where requested charge merely rephrases and repeats principles expounded in given charge
• refusal to give requested charge not error where requested charge merely rephrases and repeats principles expounded in given charge
• absent an admission by the defendant, proof of intent necessarily rests on inference from conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hiott
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-03-03· cited 55×
• State v. Lambert
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-05-05· cited 31×
• State v. Simmons
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-01· cited 22×
• State v. Meggett
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-06-27· cited 18×
• State v. Nathari
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-04-30· cited 14×
• State v. Perry
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-11-09· cited 7×
• State v. Fuller
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-23· cited 6×
• McMillian v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-07-20· cited 4×
• State v. Hayes
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-01-10· cited 3×
• State v. Land
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-09-28· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Jenkins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-06-12· cited 10×
• State v. Langford
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1899-06-17· cited 10×