Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/23/2001
State v. Fuller
Citations
- 552 S.E.2d 282
- 346 S.C. 477
- 2001 S.C. LEXIS 138
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a defendant may not be found guilty as an accessory when indicted solely as a principal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DickersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-10-03· cited 36×
- State v. BurneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-12-17· cited 8×
- State v. BlakelyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-04-10· cited 3×
- Chezmin Brittany Suter v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2017-02-21· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-08-14· cited 45×
- State v. LeonardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-04-13· cited 42×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-05· cited 24×
- State v. GatesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-11-01· cited 21×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-05-25· cited 18×
- State v. HaneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-10-22· cited 16×
- State v. BarwickSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-05-26· cited 9×
- State v. GoodSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-06-07· cited 8×
- State v. ClarySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1952-12-29· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.