Ohio Supreme Court· 2/1/2006

State v. Hancock

Citations

108 Ohio St. 3d 57
840 N.E.2d 1032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that trial judges are “clothed with a broad discretion” in determining the relevancy of trial phase evidence to the penalty phase
relying on this court’s holding in Caldwell v. Russell, 181 F.3d 731, 740 (6th Cir.1999)
Ohio state court adopting the x'easoning of Caldwell and finding that the Ohio “insanity defense does not involve the substantive elements of the criminal offense.”
“‘[T]he denial of a motion in limine does not preserve a claimed error for review in the absence of a contemporaneous objection at trial.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

349 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Hancock

65 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.