State v. Hampton
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1380
Syllabus
MOTION TO SUPPRESS – EVIDENCE – R.C. 4511.34 – ABUSE OF DISCRETION: Where competent and credible evidence existed upon which the trial court could conclude that no objectively reasonable officer would have believed defendant was following the vehicle in front of him more closely than was reasonable and prudent, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting defendant's motion to suppress evidence recovered after a traffic stop.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 850×
- State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 672×
- State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 383×
- United States v. Cecil FergusonSixth Circuit· 1993-11-01· cited 372×
- City of Bowling Green v. GodwinOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-26· cited 120×
- State v. SlaughterOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-12· cited 11×
- State v. HolmesOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-24· cited 11×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-11· cited 6×
- State v. JordanOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-28· cited 5×
- State v. MosleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-01· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.