State v. Holmes
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2485
Syllabus
Crim.R. 6(A), which establishes the size of the grand jury, does not violate Article I, Section 10 of the Ohio Constitution and was validly promulgated under Article IV, Section 5(B) of the Ohio Constitution. The trial court did not err by denying defendant-appellant's motion to suppress evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by limiting defendant-appellant's ability to cross-examine witnesses.
Judges: Preston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BinghamOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-19· cited 12×
- State v. BurroughsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-14· cited 3×
- State v. HamptonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-27· cited 3×
- State v. QuakerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-11· cited 2×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-25· cited 2×
- State v. GlaeserOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-07· cited 2×
- State v. TriplettOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-22· cited 1×
- State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-16· cited 1×
- State v. HartfieldOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-26
- State v. MetzgerOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-09
- State ex rel. Lundeen v. MidayOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-23
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.