State v. Jordan
Citations
- 145 N.E.3d 357
- 2020 Ohio 689
Syllabus
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – SEARCH AND SEIZURE – PROBABLE CAUSE – ARREST – SENTENCING – CRIM.R. 36: The trial court erred in considering defendant's post-arrest admissions when ruling on defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to his arrest, but the error was harmless where the remaining evidence before the court established probable cause that defendant had committed the crime for which he was arrested. Where the trial court announced a three-year driver's license suspension during the sentencing hearing, but the sentencing entry reflected a five-year driver's license suspension, the sentencing entry clearly contained a clerical error for which the proper remedy is to remand the cause to the trial court for a nunc pro tunc entry correcting the license-suspension portion of the sentencing entry pursuant to Crim.R. 36.
Judges: Crouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,263×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-03· cited 184×
- State v. HestonOhio Supreme Court· 1972-03-08· cited 109×
- State v. HackneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-29· cited 33×
- State v. VanNoyOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-06-18· cited 13×
- State v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-10· cited 7×
- State v. ArmsteadOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-04· cited 4×
- State v. OlagbemiroOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.