In Re Lara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Judgment does not become final so long as the action in which it is entered remains pending, and an action remains pending until final determination on appeal.”
• “Because Section 1916.1 presents a reasonable interpretation of Proposition 2, we must accept the legislature’s conclusion that a licensed real estate broker need not be acting in his licensed capacity for the usury exemption to apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hammonds
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-04-28· cited 26×
• Del Mar v. Caspe
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-08-16· cited 14×
• Garcia v. Wetzel
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-09-11· cited 13×
• Park Terrace Limited v. Teasdale
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-07-30· cited 5×
• Wishnev v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
  N.D. California· 2016-02-09· cited 2×
• Stickel v. Harris
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-11-24· cited 1×
• In re: E. Mark Moon
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-01-18
• In Re AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 15th Dist.· 2025-08-20

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Vance v. Bradley
  Supreme Court· 1979-02-22· cited 1,449×
• Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-23· cited 1,109×
• Serrano v. Priest
  California Supreme Court· 1976-12-30· cited 311×
• Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. Saylor
  California Supreme Court· 1971-09-13· cited 138×
• Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1949-03-11· cited 119×
• Newland v. Board of Governors
  California Supreme Court· 1977-07-21· cited 112×
• Hays v. Wood
  California Supreme Court· 1979-11-30· cited 96×
• In Re Samuel G. Bialac, Debtor. Samuel G. Bialac v. Harsh Investment Corporation and Harsh Building Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-12-13· cited 60×
• Golde v. Fox
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-09-27· cited 32×
• 24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1010, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,267 Ruth S. Lamb v. Scripps College, Ruth S. Lamb v. Scripps College
  Ninth Circuit· 1980-09-17· cited 26×
• McKesson Drug Co. v. Marcus
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-05-17· cited 23×
• Froid v. Fox
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-06-16· cited 22×
• Chapman v. Farr
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-06-23· cited 20×
• Robinson v. Murphy
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-09-07· cited 17×
• Orden v. Crawshaw Mortgage & Investment Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-08-12· cited 17×
• Brandwein v. California Board of Osteopathic Examiners
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-06-24· cited 9×
• Katz v. Department of Real Estate
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-08-14· cited 6×
• Zager v. Lara (In Re Lara)
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-03-15· cited 2×
• Zager v. Lara
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-05-01· cited 1×