· 3/27/1995
State v. Raffaldt
Citations
- 456 S.E.2d 390
- 318 S.C. 110
- 1995 S.C. LEXIS 46
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding evidence of marijuana dealing by the defendant in prosecution for trafficking in cocaine was admissible as indicative of a common scheme or plan
- holding evidence of marijuana dealing by the defendant in prosecution for trafficking in cocaine was admissible as indicative of a common scheme or plan
- holding evidence of marijuana dealing by the defendant in prosecution for trafficking in cocaine was admissible as indicative of a common scheme or plan
- wherein our Supreme Court held evidence of marijuana dealing by the appellant in prosecution for trafficking in cocaine was admissible as indicative of a common scheme or plan
- the State may comment on the credibility of witnesses in argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Finney, Moore, Chandler, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.