Skip to main content
· 3/27/1995

State v. Raffaldt

Citations

  • 456 S.E.2d 390
  • 318 S.C. 110
  • 1995 S.C. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence of marijuana dealing by the defendant in prosecution for trafficking in cocaine was admissible as indicative of a common scheme or plan
  • holding evidence of marijuana dealing by the defendant in prosecution for trafficking in cocaine was admissible as indicative of a common scheme or plan
  • holding evidence of marijuana dealing by the defendant in prosecution for trafficking in cocaine was admissible as indicative of a common scheme or plan
  • wherein our Supreme Court held evidence of marijuana dealing by the appellant in prosecution for trafficking in cocaine was admissible as indicative of a common scheme or plan
  • the State may comment on the credibility of witnesses in argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Finney, Moore, Chandler, Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.